We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

Close
2 FREE PAGES remain this month
or
for more website access

You can view 2 more articles. Please register to view this article, or subscribe for share tips and full online access.

Overconfidence, noise and trading

Overconfidence, noise and trading

Why do investors trade so much? The standard view - that it's because they are overconfident - is only half right, according to new research.

Economists at the University of Ulm measured overconfidence by getting people to answer general knowledge questions such as "how long is the river Nile?" and give 90 per cent confidence intervals around their answers; overconfident people tend to give too small intervals. They then got people trading in an experimental asset market. And they found that while trading activity varied a lot, the number of trades individuals made were unrelated to their degree of overconfidence. Bumptious knowalls are no more likely to trade a lot than modest folk.

But this is not the only type of overconfidence. The economists also got their subjects to predict numbers drawn from a random normal distribution based upon signals, which they were told were themselves unreliable. They found that subjects who overestimated the reliability of the signal were significantly more likely to trade than those who were wise to the signal's unreliability.

This implies that trading is motivated not by overconfidence about our ability, but by overconfidence about signals. Some people mistake noise for signal and trade on the erroneous belief that noise conveys information about future returns.

And lots of traders do this. In recent days over 1.1bn UK shares have changed hands every day. These trades cannot all have been based upon reliable signals about future returns; if they were, there wouldn't have been a seller for every buyer. This implies there's a lot of noise trading going on.

But if investors believe that others are trading on noise, they'll be more inclined to trade themselves in the belief that they can profit from the ignorant activity of the noise traders. In this sense, trading begets trading. And no, the smart trading does not drive the noise traders out of the market, not least because sometimes the smart money actually trades on the same side as the noise traders.

visible-status-Standard story-url-trading_markets_161112.xml

By Chris Dillow,
16 November 2012

Print this article

Chris Dillow

Chris spent eight years as an economist with one of Japan's largest banks. Here, he provides insightful commentary on the latest economic news and data, along with thought-provoking articles about investor behaviour.

IC columnists

Simon Thompson

Simon Thompson

Winning stock and trading ideas from the creator of the Bargain Portfolio

The Trader

The Trader

Technical analysis and market calls from our in-house charting expert

Mr Bearbull

Mr Bearbull

Sound advice on running portfolios from an experienced commentator

Smart Money

Smart Money

Practical advice and tips on planning your financial affairs

Chris Dillow

Chris Dillow

Incisive economic commentary plus thoughts on investor behaviour

Property Matters

Property Matters

Comment on the ups and downs of property investments, with a particular focus on the perennially popular world of buy to let

The Editor

The Editor

Commentary on markets, world affairs and everything to do with investing

Chronic Investor Blog

Chronic Investor Blog

Our light-hearted take on the world of investing

Advertiser reports

Register today and get...

Register today and get...