Join our community of smart investors

New China ETF dodges overvalued stocks

A new ETF aims to smooth the price differences between the same stocks trading on different exchanges
April 7, 2016

A new exchange traded fund (ETF) combines Chinese equities on different stock markets to give UK investors access to the cheapest versions of the shares for the first time. However, the difference in price between different Chinese stocks is not the only issue affecting investors in Chinese equities, and the lack of diversification in the index this ETF tracks could make it unpalatable - despite the fact it reduces the impact of overvalued shares.

Index provider FTSE Russell launched the FTSE China A-H 50 Index last month, which is now tracked by db x-trackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 Index UCITS ETF (AH50). These are the first index and ETF to overcome a confusing anomaly in Chinese equity trading, which results in identical stocks trading on the domestic and offshore market at wildly different prices. The Chinese equity market is a confusing mix of share types due to the distinction between the expensive, highly restricted and volatile domestic A share market, and the same stocks' listings on offshore markets such as the Hong Kong exchange, where they are known as H shares.

A shares are renminbi-quoted stocks listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets, and foreign investment limits means that few people can gain access to them. It is a market dominated by private investors, making it subject to dramatic swings, and stocks on it trade at a premium to the same ones listed elsewhere.

Some of the main China index choices until now have been:

■ FTSE China A50 Index, the 50 largest A share companies;

■ FTSE China 50 index, the 50 largest and most liquid H share, Red chips and P chips - Chinese companies incorporated and traded outside of mainland China;

■ CSI 300 Index - a broader A share index tracking 300 companies from the Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges; and

■ MSCI China Index - 157 stocks covering 85 per cent of the China equity universe across China H shares, B shares, Red Chips and P Chips

The A share market boomed in popularity following the announcement of the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect programme in April 2014, enabling investors on each exchange to trade in the other. Between April 2014 and June 2015 the CSI 300 index soared by 179.3 per cent. But the Chinese bubble burst dramatically in August 2015 and the CSI 300 Index fell 44.5 per cent between June 2015 and the end of August.

Despite that, on a three-year basis the FTSE China A50 Index has returned more than the H share index by far. The FTSE China 50 is down 15.1 per cent over five years, according to FTSE, compared with a positive return of 7.3 per cent from A shares.

The new FTSE China A-H 50 Index claims to offer exposure to the best of both worlds - top-performing A shares and cheaper versions of the most expensive stocks if they are also listed in Hong Kong. It starts with the top 50 A share companies traded in Shanghai and Shenzhen and for the 28 stocks that are dual listed, buys the H shares if they are cheaper. The exception is Shenzhen stocks, which are selected whether or not they have an H share counterpart. FTSE claims that returns from this index are likely to be better than either the H or A share index alone because inflated prices are stripped out.

According to back-tested data generated by the index provider, the FTSE China A-H 50 has outperformed both the other indices, returning 12.7 per cent over five years.

However, for investors in China, the price of stocks is just one concern. The Chinese market has been a volatile place to be invested in over the past year, with the country's Black Monday market rout in August 2015 leading to a global crash. Diversification and stock selection are key to ETF selection, and the new index throws up some problems when it comes to concentration.

According to Deutsche Asset Management, db x-trackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 Index UCITS ETF is 72.8 per cent allocated to financials. With just around 50 stocks that makes it a very concentrated fund, particularly compared with an ETF such as db x-trackers Harvest CSI300 Index UCITS ETF (RQFI), which has around 300 stocks and just 35.6 per cent in financials.

FTSE groups its sectors differently, splitting out insurance and real estate but banks still make up a very large concentration of the A-H 50 Index - more than either the FTSE China 50 or the FTSE China A50. As well as accounting for 40.8 per cent of the fund in total, they also account for four out of the top five companies in the index. The top five companies in the A-H 50 Index, which also include life assurance company Ping An insurance, account for 32 per cent of the index.

Adam Laird, passive investment manager at Hargreaves Lansdown, says a broader index is a better option in a high-risk market such as China. With the A-H 50 Index "you're maybe gaining diversification in the market you trade on, but you are losing diversification in terms of sector and number of holdings. I think that because of its breadth, the CSI 300 Index is probably one of the most appealing to me."

Mr Laird also highlights the MSCI China A and MSCI China indices. MSCI China A Index has over 800 constituents focused on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, and MSCI China Index, which has has 157 constituents, includes China H shares, B Shares, Red chips and P chips.

Mr Laird acknowledges that there are benefits to arbitraging the price difference between the A and H share market, but says his ideal China product would "have holdings from all of the markets out there. China is many markets: it's A shares, H shares, companies with a primary listing in Hong-Kong and American Depositary Receipts (Chinese companies listed in the US). There is not really a product out there at this moment which gives a broad exposure to all of those."

And he adds: "The volatility you get with Chinese equities means you need to seriously think about where to invest, and with an index I think broad and representative is best."

A shares to get less expensive

The A share market is expensive due to its restricted nature but as it opens out to further foreign investment should become less costly. This month the State Administration of Foreign Exchange unveiled the partial liberalisation of the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor programme - the quota system that regulates the amount of investment into A shares. It was the latest move in a long line of attempts to get A shares included in major emerging markets indices. MSCI has until now refused to include A shares in its emerging markets indices, having said in June last year that the country must further liberalise its capital markets before they could be included.

FTSE Russell has already started moving towards A share inclusion, having launched two transitional emerging markets indices in May 2015. The FTSE Emerging Markets China A inclusion indices range includes one benchmark tracking all-cap stocks and the other large- and mid-cap shares.

Any move to bring A shares into more indices would prompt an enormous swath of A share purchases, as tracker funds everywhere would have to buy them in line with their index weighting and would have an impact on the price differential between onshore and offshore equities.

Sudir Raju, managing director at FTSE Russell, says: "China is introducing policies to meet the end objective of opening up the markets and seeing A shares included in global benchmarks. After that, this price anomaly will cease to exist and we expect the price differential between the A and H market to align. But in the meantime we have created an index to use that differential."

 

FTSE China indices performance (annual total return %)

20152014201320122011
FTSE China A-H 50 -5.262.6-8.620.5-17.1
FTSE China A50-4.868.8-11.714.6-17.3
FTSE China 50 -716.2-2.917-20.7

Source: FTSE

 

db x-trackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 Index UCITS ETF (AH50) top 10 holdings

Top ten holdings
Ping An Insurance Group Co of China 9.2
China Minsheng Banking Corporation6.7
Industrial Bank Co 6.3
China Vanke Co 6.1
China Merchants Bank Co 6.0
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank5.2
CITIC Securities Co4.0
Agricultural Bank of China 3.5
Kweichow Moutai Co 3.2
Bank of Communications Co 3.0

Source: Deutsche Bank Asset Management, as at 22.03.16

 

A-H 50 index sector weightings

Financials72.8
Industrials12.3
Consumer goods7.9
Oil and gas2.3
Basic materials 1.6
Utilities 1.3
Telecommunications1.1
Healthcare0.5
Technology 0.2

Source: Deutsche Bank Asset Management, as at 22.03.16

 

CSI300 index sector weighting

Financials 40.52
Industrials 16.69
Consumer goods 13.27
Basic materials 6.64
Consumer services 6.05
Healthcare5.55
Technology 4.7
Utilities4.05
Oil & gas2.08
Telecommunications0.45

Source: Deutsche Bank, as at 29.02.16

 

Performance (% cumulative total return) China offshore equity ETFs

China offshore equity ETFsIndex tracked3m6m1yr3yr5yr
Amundi ETF MSCI China B USD (CC1G)China H index-4.30.2-23.1-4.8-13.6
DB X-Trackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF (DR) GBP (XX25)FTSE China 50-1.52.5-20.45.9-5.6
DB X-Trackers MSCI China Index UCITS ETF (DR) 1C GBP (XCX6)MSCI China-1.73.6-18.16.50.8
HSBC MSCI China GBP (HMCD)MSCI China-2.43.0-18.97.00.7
iShares China Large Cap UCITs ETF (FXC)FTSE China 50-2.33.6-20.25.1-4.8
Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL)Hang Seng China enterprises Index -4.3-1.1-25.5-6.7 

Source: FE Analytics, as at 4.04.16

 

Performance (% cumulative total return) China onshore equity ETFs

China onshore equity ETFsIndex tracked 3m6m1yr3yr5yr
Source CSOP FTSE China A50 UCITS GBP (CHNP)FTSE China A50-6.36.8-19.8nana
DB X-Trackers CSI300 UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XCHA)CSI300 -11.83.7-23.226.6na
DB X-Trackers Harvest CSI300 INDEX UCITS ETF (DR) 1D GBP (RQFI)CSI300 -10.85.8-21.6nana
ETFS ETFS-E Fund MSCI China A GO UCITS ETF GBP (CASE) MSCI China A-12.40.9-23.1nana
iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF GBP (IASH)MSCI China A-12.82.9nanana
Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS ETF MSCI CHINA A (DR) C GBP (CNAL)MSCI China A-12.71.9-23.7nana
Lyxor ETF CSI 300 A share C GBP (CSIL)CSI300 -11.92.8-23.4nana

Source: FE Analytics, as at 4.04.16