Join our community of smart investors

The best oil services shares

The oilfield services sector is looking once more like a solid long-term play.
August 22, 2012

We've long held the view that the oilfield services sector offers one of the more compelling long-term investment cases among UK indices. In truth, we've hardly been a lone voice in this regard; the sector has attracted strong capital inflows ever since Shell Expro discovered the huge Brent oilfield east of the Shetland Isles in 1971.

IC TIP: Ignore at 0.00p

UK leads the way

In the intervening period, the UK established a worldwide reputation as the leading light in subsea technology, a great export success story that's been curiously played down in the wake of the Macondo disaster. This expertise has meant that UK players in the sector have been ideally placed to profit from the swing towards ever remoter deepwater oil & gas projects, while British companies such as Hunting have also been at the forefront of the development of new-generation extraction technologies that are transforming the industry.

Advances in subsea engineering and lateral drilling techniques are opening up previously inaccessible oil and gas fields, and are allowing producers to extend the commercial life of mature fields. It’s predicted that enhanced oil recovery techniques under way will significantly boost recovery and production levels in some of the world's largest maturing fields located in the Arabian Peninsula.

More controversially, by reducing the need for hardware above the waves, subsea technologies could become the preferred option for oil companies that get the go-ahead to exploit environmentally sensitive areas above the Arctic Circle. Another point worth considering is that well operators, particularly those representing national oil companies (NOCs), are now demonstrating a clear bias towards higher specification rigs due to the greater focus on safety in the wake of the Macondo disaster.

There are also opportunities for oil services companies as mature fields wind down. Although the commercial life of the UK's North Sea assets is being extended through advanced technologies, eventually the decommissioning of these fields will provide a significant revenue stream to the oil services sector. Industry analysts predict that North Sea decommissioning receipts could total as much as £35bn, with upwards of £500m budgeted annually. And given the relative age of the UK sites, it follows that remedial and maintenance-related contracts are on the rise. Factor in the deployment of offshore wind turbines, and it’s not difficult to appreciate the apex-linked opportunities available to specialist North Sea operators over the next two decades or so.

Crude’s likely trajectory

Aside from these in-field developments, we know that expectations for growth within the sector are predicated on long-term forecasts for the oil price. That's important for oil services companies, because investment by oil producers is determined by these predictions.

In reality, it's virtually impossible to make a definitive call as to crude's likely trajectory simply because of the number of variables in play, such as the increased influence of speculative investment, or the marginal costs of oil production, the influence of a cartel (Opec), or the amount of conventional hydrocarbons controlled by NOCs. However, based on a number of potential scenarios devised by the International Energy Agency, the median figure for a barrel of oil in the year 2030 will be $101 (£64) on a constant currency basis, while the 'high price' scenario comes in at $204.

You will find marked variations to these figures depending on which energy analysts you speak to, but, in general, it's true to say that the consensus long-term call for the oil price (in real terms) is well above the nominal level at which a viable investment incentive is provided - currently held at $70 a barrel. There certainly seems to be plenty of headroom when you consider that the price of Brent Crude averaged $111 through last year.

Price (p)1-year change (%)5-year change (%)P/E ratioDividend yield (%)Market value (£m)
Amec1,12421.187.514.22.93,533
Cape206-53.2-17.65.16.8249
Hunting80827.219.320.41.91,188
Kentz Corporation350-13.0na112.2407
Lamprell93.25-66.2-68.45.68.0243
Petrofac1,49828.3302.512.92.35,181
Wood Group (John)82863.2158.117.21.03,074

 

Growth linked to non-OECD demand

Growth within the sector will also be increasingly driven by non-OECD demand. Research from US industry consultancy Douglas-Westwood suggests that demand for three out of every five rigs will be generated outside of North America by 2015. China, India and the Middle East will be the principal drivers of the estimated 1.3 per cent annual increase in demand for petroleum products, while Russia and other Arctic Rim countries will also look towards the UK for technological inputs.

The push for unconventional oil and gas deposits will also benefit oil services companies and, although demand for rigs in the US has tailed off recently as prices for natural gas slumped, there is evidence that fracking projects are starting up again alongside a recovering gas price. UK investors looking to gain direct exposure to the growth in the US unconventional market could always opt for domestic operators such as National Oilwell Varco (NYSE: NOV). Then again, as the company's rig and drill-bit equipment can be found in around 90 per cent of all drilling rigs worldwide, its revenue streams are also diversified from a geographic angle.

 

IC VIEW

The FTSE Oil Equipment, Services & Distribution index has staged a partial recovery since it headed south at the beginning of May following a temporary slump in Brent Crude prices. Nevertheless, the index is still 15 per cent ahead year on year, and over the past five years it has been the third-best performing FTSE sector behind personal goods and technical hardware & equipment. The fortunes of oil services companies are, of course, still closely tied to oil and gas prices, and are therefore susceptible to short-term volatility. But growing global energy demand will underpin huge investment in exploration and production in the coming decades, which is why we are positive on the sector.

 

FAVOURITES

We’ve identified some outstanding performers in what has been a strong performing sector. Our long-term ‘buy’ stance on Kentz Corp, for instance, has delivered a 194 per cent rise in the intervening period, but the market has been less responsive to the merits of other impressive sector constituents, such as KBC Advanced Technologies. In our original advice we said that the key attribute of KBC was that it operated under a value-added model, where its proprietary software and engineering consultancy services couldn’t easily be ignored, or replaced by an alternative. Put simply, KBC is ideally suited to benefit from an era of increased specialisation within oil services. The group’s investment case received a fillip recently, when it announced that it had acquired software developer, Infochem Computer Services. The deal represented an important strategic step for the group in its bid to establish a presence in the upstream segment of the oil and gas market. The investment case for another standout constituent – Hunting – was also given some ballast through the £508m strategic acquisition of Titan, a Texas-based manufacturer of perforating gun systems and charges. Hunting is a world leader in horizontal drilling technologies, so the accelerated push for US unconventional oil resources has provided significant impetus for Hunting's growth.

OUTSIDER

To paraphrase Oscar Wilde: to make one profit warning may be regarded as a misfortune; to announce a second looks like carelessness. So what is one to make of Lamprell, a UAE-based diversified oil services engineer that delivered three warnings in a little under two months this year? The group said that it would make a full-year loss of $12m-$17m, against an original profit estimate of $117m. The losses were apparently linked to problems with two liftboats that are used by Lamprell to erect offshore wind turbines and offshore rigs, plus there were problems within the supply chain. All of this came out of the blue as far as shareholders were concerned, and it has raised serious questions over the competency, or perhaps even integrity, of management. The staccato profits warnings were bad enough, but eyebrows were raised when it emerged that two non-board executives, Kevin Isles and Scott Doak, sold a huge number of shares in Lamprell just before the May profits warning. Lamprell was a former ‘buy’ recommendation of the IC, based largely on a growing forward order book and its ideally located manufacturing facilities, but are now no better than a hold.